Skip to content

AgencyAnalytics vs DashThis for local client reporting

Two agency reporting tools compared for local clients: what each connects to, how reports get built, and how to put calls and bookings in front of clients.

The first-quarter reports went out a few weeks ago, and for many agencies they were harder to write than usual. Google’s March core update rolled through the second half of last month, AI Mode appeared in Labs in early March, and AI Overviews appear on more queries than they did at Christmas. Clients who glanced at a traffic chart and nodded are now asking why impressions went up while clicks stayed flat.

A good reporting tool will not answer that question for you, but a bad one makes it much harder to answer. So this spring we have been asked, more than once, how two tools agencies often mention to us compare: AgencyAnalytics and DashThis.

What an agency needs from a reporting tool

For an agency serving local businesses, the reporting tool has a job beyond pulling numbers together. It is the one thing most clients see every month, and it carries your brand. What decides the choice:

  • What you need to connect. Ads, analytics and Search Console are standard. Call tracking, the CRM and the Google profile are where local reporting lives, and support for them varies.
  • How much setup time you can spare. A tool that takes a week to configure per client costs real hours at twenty clients.
  • Whether clients log in or just receive a report. Some clients never open a dashboard. Others want to check it weekly.
  • Whether you want other tools inside the reporting product. Rank tracking and site audits built in, or kept elsewhere.

AgencyAnalytics: a reporting platform built for agencies

AgencyAnalytics is a reporting platform designed around the agency business. It offers live client dashboards, scheduled reports, white-label branding, and client logins, backed by a long list of integrations. It also includes its own SEO tools, such as rank tracking and site audits, so some agencies use it in place of separate SEO software.

Its strength is that it treats reporting as part of client management. The dashboards can be the client’s regular view of the work, under your own branding, and the built-in SEO tools mean fewer subscriptions to reconcile.

With more features comes more to set up. Ask which integrations you need are supported natively, which features sit in which plan, and how the plan counts clients and users, and get those answers in writing before committing.

DashThis: dashboards that are quick to build

DashThis is a reporting dashboard tool with a tighter focus. You connect the data sources, choose a template, and get a dashboard that refreshes itself and can be shared by link or emailed on a schedule. It is designed to be quick to set up, and it accepts spreadsheet and CSV data for sources it does not connect to directly.

Its strength is speed and clarity. An agency that wants clean, consistent reports without a long setup can have a client dashboard running quickly, and the spreadsheet import means an unusual data source does not stop the report from being complete.

It does less beyond reporting by design. Ask which integrations are native, which plans include white-label options, and how dashboards are counted, and keep the answers on file.

The two side by side

AgencyAnalytics DashThis
Built around Agency client management and reporting Fast, clean reporting dashboards
Setup effort More to configure, more features once done Quick to connect and template
SEO tools Rank tracking and site audits built in Brings in data from your SEO tools
Unsupported data sources Check the integration list; ask about imports Spreadsheet and CSV import
Client access Branded client logins and scheduled reports Shared links and scheduled emails
Ask before choosing How plans count clients and users Which plans include white-label options

Pros and cons

AgencyAnalytics

  • Pro: one platform for reporting and several SEO tools, which can cut subscriptions.
  • Pro: built for agencies, with client logins and white-label branding at its center.
  • Pro: a wide integration list covers most standard marketing sources.
  • Con: more to configure, which takes time at the start of every client.
  • Con: the built-in SEO tools may duplicate software you already pay for and prefer.
  • Con: features vary by plan, so confirm the demo matches the plan you would actually buy.

DashThis

  • Pro: fast to set up and easy for clients to read.
  • Pro: spreadsheet and CSV imports make almost any source reportable.
  • Pro: a narrow focus means less for your team to learn.
  • Con: fewer tools beyond reporting, so you keep separate SEO software.
  • Con: any source you upload by hand needs someone to remember it every month.
  • Con: check which branding options come with the plan you choose.

Which fits which agency

  • An SEO-led agency paying for separate rank tracking and audit tools. AgencyAnalytics may replace some of them, so price the whole stack, not the reporting line alone.
  • A small paid media shop that wants a tidy report out the door fast. DashThis fits that workflow.
  • An agency whose local clients care about booked jobs above everything else. Either tool can work, but only if call tracking and CRM outcomes reach the dashboard. Check the integrations for your call tracking and CRM first; if one is missing, plan the monthly import before you sign.
  • An agency with clients who never log in. Scheduled emailed reports matter more than the dashboard, so judge each tool on what the email looks like.

The number neither tool can invent

Both tools are only as good as what flows into them. For a local business, the numbers that matter are calls answered, forms turned into appointments, and appointments that became paying customers. None of that exists in an ad platform by default. It lives in call tracking and in the CRM, and it only lives there if the front desk updates the record.

So whichever tool you pick, the reporting project is really a data project: a tracked number on the site, a source field on every form, the click ID stored with the lead, and outcomes written back in the CRM.

How we report for agencies

When agencies white-label Beyaoshy’s fulfillment, the report their client receives leads with calls and bookings pulled from the CRM, usually a GoHighLevel build we set up and maintain, then works back to the channels that produced them. The same team runs the SEO, the Google profile, the ads, the reviews and the site, so the numbers in the report come from work we can explain line by line.

The client owns the accounts and the data from the first day, which keeps the agency’s position clean if anything ever changes. We have worked with local businesses since 2015, and fulfillment is quoted per client, so you know your cost before the tool subscriptions and your margin go on top.

If your agency is weighing fulfillment partners, our page for agencies explains how we work. For the CRM side of reporting, see our GoHighLevel builds, and for the ad data feeding it, our Google Ads management.

Written April 23, 2025, and kept as written. Platforms, features and policies mentioned here are described as they stood at the time.

Agencies run client work through us under their own brand.

One team, operating since 2015, does the local SEO, ads, CRM and review work, and the agency keeps the client relationship. See how the partner model works, or get our monthly notes for agency owners.