Looker Studio vs AgencyAnalytics for client reporting
Looker Studio or AgencyAnalytics for agency client reports: what each does well, where each strains, and why calls and bookings belong in both.
Five days ago Google opened AI Mode in Labs, and local clients have already started asking whether their business shows up in it. That question lands just as February’s reports are going out, which is when agency owners tend to look hard at how reports get made and whether the tool behind them is earning its place.
For many agencies serving local businesses, the shortlist comes down to two tools: Looker Studio, Google’s dashboard and reporting product, and AgencyAnalytics, a reporting platform built specifically for agencies. Each is a good tool with a different idea of who should do the building.
What a client report is for
Before choosing software, agree on what the report has to do. For a local business client, we think it has three jobs.
- Show whether the phone rang and the calendar filled. Calls, form leads and booked appointments by source, in the client’s own words.
- Explain the change. Why this month differs from last month and what the agency did about it.
- Take as little of your team’s time as possible to produce, check and send.
Traffic, rankings and impressions support that story. They are not the story. Keep that in mind, because both tools will happily produce a beautiful report that never mentions a booking.
Looker Studio: a blank canvas from Google
Looker Studio, the tool formerly called Google Data Studio, builds dashboards from data sources you connect. The Google connectors are built in: Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, Search Console, Sheets and BigQuery. Everything else comes through partner connectors, many of them from third-party companies, so check what each one costs and who supports it when it breaks.
Its strength is flexibility. You can blend sources, write calculated fields, design any layout, and share a live report by link or send it by scheduled email. An agency with someone who enjoys building dashboards can make a report that looks exactly the way it wants and answers questions no template would. There is also a Pro version for teams that want more administrative control; ask Google what it adds for your setup.
The cost is time. Every client dashboard has to be built, and someone has to fix it when a connector changes or a data source goes quiet. By default the reports also live on Google’s domain rather than yours.
AgencyAnalytics: a reporting platform built for agencies
AgencyAnalytics is software made for exactly this job. It connects to a long list of marketing platforms, including ad networks, analytics, SEO tools, social platforms and call tracking services, and turns them into dashboards and scheduled reports from templates.
Its strengths are speed and presentation. A new client’s reporting can be set up quickly from a template. The platform offers white-label branding, including your own domain on the plans that support it, client logins so clients can check their dashboard between reports, and built-in SEO tools such as rank tracking and site audits. For an agency with many clients and no dedicated data person, that saves real hours every month.
The tradeoffs are the ones any packaged tool has. You work within the integrations and widgets it offers, custom calculations are more limited than on a blank canvas, and you should ask how the cost changes as your client list grows before you migrate everyone.
The two tools, row by row
| Looker Studio | AgencyAnalytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Who builds the reports | Your team, from scratch or from a template | Your team, from prebuilt templates and widgets |
| Data sources | Native Google connectors, third-party connectors for the rest | A large set of built-in marketing integrations |
| Branding | Your design, on Google’s domain | White-label branding, with a custom domain on some plans |
| Client access | Shared links and scheduled emails | Client logins and scheduled reports |
| Upkeep | Connector fixes and dashboard maintenance fall to you | Integrations maintained by the vendor |
| Ask first | Which connectors you need and who supports them | How costs scale with clients, and which integrations your stack needs |
Where each earns its keep, and where it does not
Looker Studio
Pros
- Very flexible: blend data, build custom metrics, design any layout
- Strong native connections to Google’s own products
- Available to anyone with a Google account, with no new vendor to add
Cons
- Every dashboard takes real time to build and maintain
- Non-Google data depends on third-party connectors
- Harder to present as your own product under your own domain
AgencyAnalytics
Pros
- Fast to set up for each new client
- White-label branding, client logins and scheduled reports built in
- Rank tracking and SEO audits in the same place as the reports
Cons
- Less freedom for unusual metrics and blended data
- Ask how the cost changes as your client list grows
- You depend on the integrations the platform chooses to support
Picking by agency type
A two-person agency with twelve local clients and no data specialist. AgencyAnalytics. The time saved is worth more than the flexibility you give up.
An agency with a technical lead who likes building dashboards and a lot of Google Ads work. Looker Studio lets that person build reports nobody else has, and the Google connectors cover most of what those clients need.
An agency selling SEO as its main service. AgencyAnalytics, largely for the built-in rank tracking and audits.
An agency whose clients keep asking about bookings, not traffic. Either, provided the CRM and call tracking data actually reach the report. Without that, neither tool can answer the question.
And on the AI Mode question: neither tool shows clean visibility inside AI answers, and the separate trackers that sample those answers give you a snapshot, not a count. Tell clients that plainly rather than inventing a metric to fill the gap.
Reports that start from the booking
The strongest reports we see do not start from the tool. They start from the CRM, where each lead carries its source and its outcome, and work outward to the channels that produced it. That is how Beyaoshy approaches reporting in the work we have done for local businesses since 2015, and it is how we deliver for partner agencies too: under the agency’s brand, with calls and booked appointments by source at the top and the traffic figures underneath.
Because one team runs the Google Business Profile, local SEO, ads, reviews, the site and the GoHighLevel CRM for each client, the numbers come from the same place and agree with each other. The end client owns every account and the data in it from day one. And the partner sets the price its client sees, so the margin is its own decision. Whichever reporting tool you settle on, the data it needs most is the booking, and that has to be captured before any dashboard can show it.
See how the white-label work is set up on our partners page, and how the GoHighLevel CRM behind the reports is built.
Written March 10, 2025, and kept as written. Platforms, features and policies mentioned here are described as they stood at the time.
Agencies run client work through us under their own brand.
One team, operating since 2015, does the local SEO, ads, CRM and review work, and the agency keeps the client relationship. See how the partner model works, or get our monthly notes for agency owners.